ISLAMABAD: Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail on Monday questioned whether the Supreme Court judges hearing petitions against the 26th Constitutional Amendment could do so if they were its “beneficiaries”.

Advocate Abid Shahid Zuberi speaks at the rostrum, as an eight-member SC Constitutional Bench hears challenges against the 26th Amendment during live-streamed proceedings, on Oct 15, 2025. — ...

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed live streaming of proceedings in scores of petitions challenging the validity of the 26th Constitutional Amendment. An eight-member Constitutional Bench ...

An eight-judge Constitutional Bench (CB) of the Supreme Court (SC) approved on Tuesday a set of requests seeking the live streaming of proceedings on pleas challenging the 26th Amendment. The ...

Eight-judge Constitutional Bench resumes hearing over three dozen petitions against 26th Amendment Justice Ayesha terms Article 191A ‘procedural’, says limits apply to benches not SC Judges debate ...

ISLAMABAD: Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail questioned whether the benches are formed based on wishes or as per the law, as the petitioners’ demand to ignore Article 191A of the Constitution, but also ...

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court's (SC) Constitutional Bench (CB) can hear the 26th Amendment case, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar remarked on Wednesday, adding that judges from all the constitutional ...

The Supreme Court on Thursday held a discussion on the composition of the bench competent to hear petitions against the 26th Constitutional Amendment, as a counsel for the petitioners urged that the ...

ISLAMABAD: Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan of the Supreme Court questioned whether only the 16 judges who were part of the Court before the 26th Amendment could hear the petitions challenging it, or if all ...